Skip to main content

Who's Improving?

I've taught three classes in which I never changed the content of the course and I only changed the teaching approach by very little. They were my advanced writing class at the University of Wisconsin in La Crosse and both methodology courses at Sookmyung Women's University in Seoul. In all three classes, I noticed a marked improvement in the students semester after semester. Either the students were getting better or I was improving.

I taught the same material in relatively the same manner in Seoul for 3 years, which is 6 different terms. In La Crosse, I did the same for 4 semesters. However my feelings about the outcome were different for each case.

Seeing better results from my students from term to term in Korea was rewarding. This meant I didn't have to spend as much time explaining certain vocabulary and concepts as I did in previous terms. The students' English levels weren't necessarily higher, but it seemed that their understanding of the content (TESOL methodology) was. The objectives of the methodology courses were always met at the end, but during the last few terms it seemed that students didn't have to struggle as hard to develop sample lesson plans and get good scores on exams. However nobody ever told me that the courses were too easy.

Seeing better results from my students from semester to semester in La Crosse was frustrating. Every semester it seemed that students would reach my course objectives earlier by a month. For the semester that just finished, I believed that 90% of the students reached the objectives by the mid-term. I was told that students' abilities waver from semester to semester, but for this course it didn't seem true. They just got better and better. Nobody told me that my course was too easy, but a few student's attitudes and body language indicated so.

I had to think back to the first semester of teaching the same class. I used the same book and I taught in nearly the same way. The biggest difference was the conferencing (peer editing) stage of the writing process. Outside conferencing, I noticed that the majority of students had a difficult time understanding how to construct a 5-paragraph essay until the very end of class. This was not so in subsequent classes. Every semester, students would understand how to construct a 5-paragraph essay sooner and sooner.

I have talked with instructors who teach at around the same level as my essay writing class, and most of them have also noticed marked improvement in the majority of students during the last 3-4 semesters. Perhaps it is the students who are improving. If this is truly so, then the next semester should be made to be more challenging.

But then I think back to my experience in Seoul. The content I taught was more challenging, and I taught the subject with greater ease from term to term. I was also able to answer questions with less ambiguity and more confidence. In this case, I believe it was me who was improving, but I can't rule out the students.

I believe this kind of exercise is useful in the development of an instructor. If you feel that the course objectives are being met quicker, don't be too quick to take credit for improved instructor and also don't be too quick to believe that you had a wonderful batch of students that semester. Take time to think it over, so the right adjustments (if any) can be made for the next time you teach the course.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are you an Open Educator?

Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/gforsythe/18162314289 What is an Open Educator? According to a recently published article from the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL):

An Open Educator chooses to use open approaches, when possible and appropriate, with the aim to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning. He/she works through an open online identity and relies on online social networking to enrich and implement his/her work, understanding that collaboration bears a responsibility towards the work of others.

Does this sound attractive for English language teachers? It seems to some who offer courses through or with YouTube. But what does it mean "to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning?" Working for free? Not necessarily. If you read the article, it seems you'd be working on a sliding scale depending on the socioeconomic status of the learners, but this sliding scale is a sliding slope. How can poor le…

Engagement with Research as Professional Development

Last Thursday, I was reviewing literature for a research project that is just underway, and I came across a couple tables that resonated with me so much that I had to share it on Twitter. The tables come from Simon Borg's 2010 article "Language Teacher Research Engagement."


These tables would have come in handy if I had found them prior to my research project with teachers at an intensive English program (IEP) in the United States. They would have supported my professional learning and curriculum development philosophies as an administrator because I believe these two areas, professional learning and curriculum development, should have strongly overlapping goals as an English language teacher. Furthermore, I believe that it is in the best interest of an institution to support this in order to improve the curriculum. This belief is based on the assumption that curriculum is not static because is based on the needs of the learners, which are dynamic, as well as the resear…

Revisiting Multiliteracies & Moving On

I have been interested in a multiliteracies approach to English language learning and teaching for almost a decade now. I've been blogging about it since 2010 and I gave a presentation on this for two conferences in Iowa. I decided to put this interest aside so I could complete my dissertation on another topic and search for jobs. Now that a few years have passed, I'd like to share how my interest has changed.

The foundation of my interest is best represented by the Prezi I made (below) for my 2010 MIDTESOL Conference presentation:



My primary reference was Stuart Selber's 2004 book Multiliteracies for a Digital Age, published by Southern Illinois University Press. While working for the Kirkwood Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (KCELT), I found some similarities between my highlighted concepts from Selber's book and the Framework for 21st Century Learning, which you can view at http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework. The third category (Information, Med…