Skip to main content

Proficiency & Discipline

Lately in my career, I have been paying more attention to assessing students in terms of academic discipline or the ability to utilize certain study strategies on their own. This has been most important in two of my positions, one as teacher trainer at Sookmyung Women's University-TESOL in Korea and one as an instructor of English for Academic Purposes at the University of Wisconsin at La Crosse.

Personal Background
In Korea, the TESOL program was developed so that students were assessed in generally the same way in all classes. All instructors had to follow the same guidelines for implementing and carrying out the terms and conditions for absences, tardiness, late and missing assignments, missing tests, and classroom participation. One reason for the success of this program is that these guidelines were followed very strictly by all the teacher trainers. A misbehaving or cheating student was detected quickly and usually was not awarded the TESOL certificate.

In La Crosse, I have more flexibility in creating my own rules guidelines. The program does have a standard for absences, tardiness, and late and missing assignments, but each instructor enforces these standards in their own way. Because of my experience in Korea, I took the stricter interpretation of the rules. This caused some students to disfavor me and/or my class because I would not show flexibility with them. In their defense, most of these students were undergraduates in America for the first time whereas all of my students in Korea were graduates with good undergraduate grade point averages.

Assessing Students
A common topic of discussion at the ESL Institute at the University of Wisconsin at La Crosse is how to assess students, and to make the decision to pass or fail them in the course. (Except for the highest level courses, all courses are graded as pass or fail.) All the instructors agree that students' language proficiency should get the most attention in the assessment. However, I find that we disagree on how much attention should be placed on their academic discipline.

Our program's main goal is to get students ready for non-ESL academic courses at the university. I believe many people not familiar with ESL may assume that instructors only prepare them linguistically for university courses. But I, along with many others in my profession, believe that we are also preparing them culturally for university courses. I am mostly referring to the fact that expectations for student performance is different in the United States to those in other countries.

My Experience
During my first year at the ESL Institute at UWL, my grading scale heavily emphasized developing language skills. However, I noticed that students were approaching the class with the strategies that helped them get through their ESL or EFL courses in their home country. For many students, these strategies would not get them far in American higher education. The most famous example is the attitude towards plagiarism.

During my second year, I incorporated a more structured approach to facilitate learning in adapting to and adopting American study habits. Incidentally, I volunteered to teach a pilot course with the sole purpose of elaborating on developing study strategies during that second year. I have discovered that, with students lacking these skills, the majority of them were thankful for learning them. However there was a minority that resisted to develop the study strategies needed to get through a four-year American university. For many of those who resisted to change their study habits, it was a matter of pride, either self-pride or national pride.
I could only wish them good luck.

Possible Research
With all this in mind, I have gained interest in assessing students based on developing language proficiency in addition to the appropriate study strategies. When students come in to most ESL programs, they are given a diagnostic or placement exam so that they can be placed in the right level. But, to my knowledge, there is no placement exam for study strategies.

When students are in my courses, I am immediately drawn not to the students with the highest language proficiency but the to the students with the best study strategies. Especially in an EAP course, I am confident that these students will do well in American higher education. These students usually catch up and sometimes surpass the students who had higher language proficiency at the beginning of the course.

Personally I feel at a loss for students with good language skills but do not improve as quickly as others in my class. They only pass because their language skills were high enough at the beginning that a slight improvement was all they needed. I feel even worse for those with lower language skills that show little or no willingness to develop the study strategies to become more autonomous learners. They will do all or most of the homework, but they cannot take constructive feedback well. I'd like to learn how to get through to the students who do not take this constructive feedback. I know that for some of them they do not understand the feedback, but for the ones that do, I feel that I need to develop my own strategies to help them develop internal motivation to improve themselves.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Horror! A Listening Curriculum for English Language Learning

I've been inspired by Clare Maas' blog post, which was inspired by Dr. John Field's TEASIG/CRELLA talks, to share my shock at the listening curriculum of an intensive English program where I previously worked. To be fair, this listening curriculum was designed twenty years prior and my job was to lead faculty efforts to revise it. Unfortunately, the program went through financial difficulties and leadership changes, resulting in the "non-renewal" of most of the curriculum committee members.
Upper-Level (EAP) Listening (B2-C1) Listening was relatively equally integrated with speaking and reading skills in one course set apart from another course that focused much more on writing. This was the case for the two highest levels for students who intended to matriculate into the university as undergraduates. The highest level was not dependent on any one coursebook, so all of the listening material had to be collected by the instructors. When I was the curriculum coordi…

Research in the ELT Profession & Industry

My career has taken me to the uncomfortable and sometimes exciting spot in English language teaching or education in general: middle management, a term I dislike. As an advocate of teachers, I find my direction and passion by supporting teachers, helping them make their jobs more meaningful. Unfortunately, I have had to work with supervisors that didn't understand or share this vision. I'm not sure if they saw me as someone to "manage" teachers, but it often felt like it. If you don't know what middle management jobs are, and there are a lot of them, they go by many different names. Match any of the words in the left column with the words in the right column to create a job title that can describe the same job.


It seems that most of these job descriptions do not include research, which I believe is essential in developing curriculum and professional learning. It also seems obvious to me that a background in pedagogical research (and for ELT, research in applied …

Engagement with Research as Professional Development

Last Thursday, I was reviewing literature for a research project that is just underway, and I came across a couple tables that resonated with me so much that I had to share it on Twitter. The tables come from Simon Borg's 2010 article "Language Teacher Research Engagement."


These tables would have come in handy if I had found them prior to my research project with teachers at an intensive English program (IEP) in the United States. They would have supported my professional learning and curriculum development philosophies as an administrator because I believe these two areas, professional learning and curriculum development, should have strongly overlapping goals as an English language teacher. Furthermore, I believe that it is in the best interest of an institution to support this in order to improve the curriculum. This belief is based on the assumption that curriculum is not static because is based on the needs of the learners, which are dynamic, as well as the resear…