Skip to main content

Integrating Extensive Reading into Intensive English Programs


Last week at the 2017 INTESOL Conference, I gave a presentation with my colleague, Emi Zlatkovska from the University of Southern Indiana, on extensive reading at our respective IEPs. Below are excerpts from the slides from my half of the presentation.

What is Extensive Reading?

ER is a pedagogical approach in which teachers help and allow learners to choose what they want to read, and they act as a role model of a reader to enable learners to engage in the specific type of reading: ‘fluent, sustained, comprehension of text as meaning-focused input; large volume of material; reading over extended periods of time; and texts are longer, requiring comprehension at the discourse level’ (Waring & McLean, 2015, p 165).

The Effect of ER Programs on Learners

Overall reading proficiency – small to medium effect (Jeon & Day, 2015; Nakanishi 2014)
  • Highest effect with adults
  • One year of ER had a higher effect than one semester of ER 
Easier materials are more beneficial (Yamashita, 2015)
  • Linguistic gains emerge more quickly than gains in motivation 
Reading outside class time increased content-based test scores (Robb & Kano, 2013).
The amount of time spent on reading graded readers directly impacted students’ positive attitudes (Tien, 2015).

With all these benefits, Jeon and Day (2016) caution these results are not immediate and it takes time to see the benefits. In terms of implementation, they suggest it is easier when ER is part of the curriculum, ER needs systematic support from their programs, and programs can alleviate costs by using computer readers and digital texts. 

Abstract 

This case study investigated the curriculum development process of integrating extensive reading (ER) into an intensive English program (IEP). Specifically, it looked at the extent to which instructors support integrating ER into the curriculum and how their insights aid the curriculum development process. With a qualitative approach, data sources included focus group and individual interviews with the IEP instructors as well as the minutes from the IEP’s curriculum committee meetings. Findings showed all instructors agreed upon the importance of ER in the curriculum, however they were concerned about its implementation. The instructors’ collaborative efforts in development showed that the quality of ER materials was most important to them. Input from the teachers helped the committee make decisions regarding how much class time should be spent on ER and how to monitor ER in and outside the classroom.  

Why Teachers’ Perspectives on ER in the Curriculum? 

 “Without convincing them of its advantages over traditional teaching, it could be very difficult to adopt an ER approach in school settings’ (Jeon & Day, 2015).

Teachers’ perspectives or beliefs inform their instructional decisions and departures from lesson plans (Borg, 2006).

One reason teachers may not grasp the theory behind ER is it is not clearly defined (Macalister, 2015) and because of the flexible nature of its approach in various educational settings (Yamashita, 2015).

There is not one single model that can be directly applied to every context, so teachers and administrators need to develop an approach that works best for their program and the needs of their students.

Research Questions

  1. To what extent do instructors support integrating ER into their IEP curriculum? 
  2. How do their insights aid the curriculum development process?   

The Extent of Faculty Support for ER 

All faculty members supported the integration of ER into the curriculum. Disagreement arose on how it should be integrated. Most disagreements took months to settle because of their incomplete understanding of ER. On the positive side, they were in agreement with one of the top ten principles for ER: that the purpose is usually related to pleasure, information, and general understanding (Day, 2002; Macalister, 2005).

However, one teacher’s suggestion for using stories that were thematically connected to the required readings in the course books violates a couple of Day’s (2002) principles in ER, specifically that there should be a variety of reading material on a wide range of topics and learners should be able to choose what they want to read, stories or not. This suggestion would lead the curriculum committee away from developing an ER program adherent to the core principles.

Collaborative Efforts to Integrate ER into the Curriculum

Quality reading materials for the students was the most important feature for the teachers, and this took up the majority of curriculum meetings on ER.

Most of the teachers were not certain about ER implementation, supporting claims that approach is not clearly defined (Macalister, 2015) and that ER’s flexible nature makes its principles difficult to grasp (Yamashita, 2015).

The curriculum committee served as a helpful and productive community of practice.

Conclusion 

The teachers valued sharing their practical suggestions with their peers over discussing the theoretical principles of ER.

References

Borg, S. (2006). Teacher cognition and language education: Research and practice. London, England: Continuum.
Day, R. (2002). Top ten principles for teaching extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 136-141.
Jeon, E.-Y. & Day, R.R. (2015). The effectiveness of core ER principles. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(2), 302–307.
Jeon, E-Y. & Day, R.R. (2016). The effectiveness of ER on reading proficiency: A meta-analysis. Reading in a Foreign Language, 28(2), 246-265.
Macalister, J. (2015). Guidelines or commandments? Reconsidering core principles in extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 122–128.
Nakanishi, T. (2014). A meta-analysis of extensive reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 49(1), 6–37. doi:10.1002/tesq.157
Robb, T. & Kano, M. (2013). Effective extensive reading outside the classroom: A large-scale experiment. Reading in a Foreign Language, 25(2), 234–247.
Tien, C. (2015). A large-scale study on extensive reading program for non-English majors: factors and attitudes. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4(4), 46-54. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.4n.4p.46
Waring, R. & McLean, S. (2015). Exploration of the core and variable dimensions of extensive reading research and pedagogy. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 160–167.
Yamashita, J. (2015). In search of the nature of extensive reading in L2: Cognitive, affective, and pedagogical perspectives. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1), 168–181.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Wikipedia Too Difficult to Read?

Image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Afghan_man_reading_Wikipedia_article_in_Kandahar.jpg The short answer via statistical analysis is yes .  For more information, read  Lucassen, T., Dijkstra, R., & Schraagen, J. M. (2012). Readability of Wikipedia.  First Monday at   http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3916/3297 .  Wikipedians are aware that the open online encyclopedia may be too difficult, and there is a discussion of its reading level at  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Reading_level . Much of this discussion took place over a decade ago, but the gist is that many contributors write at or for the college level. What appeals to me most is at the end of the page, where Wikipedians are discussing accessibility and what it means to be open to all. Here's my screenshot (in case it gets edited later). What does this mean for English language teachers? I was interested in seeing how selected Wikipedia articles range according to
1 comment
Read more

Adrian Holliday

In January 2015, the University of Warwick (UK) hosted a lecture by Dr. Adrian Holliday, whose work has greatly influenced my dissertation.  The lecture was recorded and can be viewed at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/groups/llta/activities/events/holliday .  If you are interested in watching the video, I advise that you wear headphones as Dr. Holliday was not wearing a microphone.   For this blog, I briefly summarize the video, highlighting what I found most provocative.  Following that, I explain how Holliday's work has influenced my research and teaching philosophy for the past 5-10 years. Summary of "Revisiting appropriate methodology, BANA, TESEP and 'contexts'" The main purpose of this lecture was for Holliday to reflect upon his book Appropriate Methodology and Social Context , published 20 years ago by Cambridge University Press.  In this lecture, he integrated criticism from another professor whose research I admire, Dr. Suresh Cana
Post a Comment
Read more

TESOL Job Market Trends 2009-2018

I have been tracking full-time TESOL jobs since Fall 2009, my first year as a Ph.D. student at the University of Iowa. Back then, the job market was quite bad because of the 2008 economic crisis. My motivation for tracking jobs was to help my future TESOL students understand the market. This was based on colleagues asking about good locations to live and work. I had hunches but not enough data, and now I have almost a decade of data. What did I track?  In Fall 2009, I started tracking TESOL job announcements from HigherEdJobs.com and the TESOL Career Center for tenure and non-tenure professorships in universities and community colleges. In 2010, I expanded my tracking to include instructor positions at universities (mainly intensive English programs) and "other" jobs, which used to be mainly governmental, non-profit, and publishing jobs. But now they are predominantly in the for-profit higher education ELT industry, including corporations like Shorelight and INTO. In 201
2 comments
Read more