Skip to main content

Are you an Open Educator?

Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/gforsythe/18162314289

What is an Open Educator?

According to a recently published article from the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL):

 An Open Educator chooses to use open approaches, when possible and appropriate, with the aim to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning. He/she works through an open online identity and relies on online social networking to enrich and implement his/her work, understanding that collaboration bears a responsibility towards the work of others.

Does this sound attractive for English language teachers? It seems to some who offer courses through or with YouTube. But what does it mean "to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning?" Working for free? Not necessarily. If you read the article, it seems you'd be working on a sliding scale depending on the socioeconomic status of the learners, but this sliding scale is a sliding slope. How can poor learners prove their poor? How easy is it for wealthy learners to show you that their not wealthy?

What does an Open Educator do?

Let's assume you can make a living as an Open English Language Educator. What are the practices of an Open Educator? The article lists four main activities:
  1. Implements open learning design by openly sharing ideas and plans about his/her teaching activities with experts and with past and potential students, incorporating inputs, and transparently leaving a trace of the development process.
     
  2. Uses open educational content by releasing his/her teaching resources through open licenses, by facilitating sharing of her resources through OER repositories and other means, and by adapting, assembling, and using OERs produced by others in his/her teaching.
     
  3. Adopts open pedagogies fostering co-creation of knowledge by students through online and offline collaboration and allowing learners to contribute to public knowledge resources such as Wikipedia.
     
  4. Implements open assessment practices such as peer and collaborative evaluation, open badges, and e-portfolios, engaging students as well as external stakeholders in learning assessment.

After reading this, are you on the Open Educator train now? What attracts you to and repulses you from this type of teaching? Do you think this is the future of English language teaching? What about your boss? Does he or she want this to be the future of your program?

Transformation Process

The last part of the article describes how to transform from a traditional teacher to an Open Educator. I can see myself in both early stages of the transformation process. The framework they provide helps me to see if this is the direction I want to go in. Where in this process are you? Do you want to move forward a little, a lot, or do you prefer to stay a traditional teacher (at least for now)?


Depending on where you teach, some teachers get to participate in all of these categories.



  • Collaborative designer = as it states (This is actually the main purpose of my current job.)
  • OER novice = you share materials with colleagues and the online community
  • Engaging teacher = you integrate technology into the classroom
  • Innovative evaluator = assessment is done with peers 
As a side note, many intensive English programs in the United States are required to demonstrate most elements of this phase to earn or maintain accreditation. This does not necessarily mean the program must move towards Open Education.


  • Open designer = you share your ideas online (like I'm doing here)
  • OER expert = you use, produce, and distribute OERs often
  • Open teacher = you and your students share learning openly
  • Open evaluator = goes beyond the school to evaluate students' learning
As a side note here, I assume most English language programs would not support most of these elements for proprietary reasons. If an English language teacher in a very competitive for-profit English language program decided to become an Open Educator, then they will be at high risk of losing their job. However, my experience in multiple schools shows that it's the teacher-student relationship or rapport or engagement that is makes one's program unique and not the curriculum. My belief is that if students feel appreciated and cared for in a program, then more students will be drawn to your program. An open curriculum (that is effective and efficient) across multiple programs is like a rising tide that floats all boats. However, many administrators do not share this belief or do not understand this model well enough. It's this belief helps me strive to become an Open Educator. 

 So where are you in terms of Open Education? Will you lead the effort, participate in the effort, watch the effort closely or from afar?

Reference:

Nascimbeni, F. & Burgos, D. (2016). In search for the Open Educator: Proposal of a definition and a framework to increase openness adoption among university educators. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning. Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/2736/3974

 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Is Wikipedia Too Difficult to Read?

Image from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Afghan_man_reading_Wikipedia_article_in_Kandahar.jpg The short answer via statistical analysis is yes .  For more information, read  Lucassen, T., Dijkstra, R., & Schraagen, J. M. (2012). Readability of Wikipedia.  First Monday at   http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3916/3297 .  Wikipedians are aware that the open online encyclopedia may be too difficult, and there is a discussion of its reading level at  https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Reading_level . Much of this discussion took place over a decade ago, but the gist is that many contributors write at or for the college level. What appeals to me most is at the end of the page, where Wikipedians are discussing accessibility and what it means to be open to all. Here's my screenshot (in case it gets edited later). What does this mean for English language teachers? I was interested in seeing how selected Wikipedi...
1 comment
Read more

The Horror! A Listening Curriculum for English Language Learning

I've been inspired by Clare Maas' blog post , which was inspired by Dr. John Field's TEASIG/CRELLA talks, to share my shock at the listening curriculum of an intensive English program where I previously worked. To be fair, this listening curriculum was designed twenty years prior and my job was to lead faculty efforts to revise it. Unfortunately, the program went through financial difficulties and leadership changes, resulting in the "non-renewal" of most of the curriculum committee members. Upper-Level (EAP) Listening (B2-C1) Listening was relatively equally integrated with speaking and reading skills in one course set apart from another course that focused much more on writing. This was the case for the two highest levels for students who intended to matriculate into the university as undergraduates. The highest level was not dependent on any one coursebook, so all of the listening material had to be collected by the instructors. When I was the curriculum ...
Post a Comment
Read more

Adrian Holliday

In January 2015, the University of Warwick (UK) hosted a lecture by Dr. Adrian Holliday, whose work has greatly influenced my dissertation.  The lecture was recorded and can be viewed at http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/al/research/groups/llta/activities/events/holliday .  If you are interested in watching the video, I advise that you wear headphones as Dr. Holliday was not wearing a microphone.   For this blog, I briefly summarize the video, highlighting what I found most provocative.  Following that, I explain how Holliday's work has influenced my research and teaching philosophy for the past 5-10 years. Summary of "Revisiting appropriate methodology, BANA, TESEP and 'contexts'" The main purpose of this lecture was for Holliday to reflect upon his book Appropriate Methodology and Social Context , published 20 years ago by Cambridge University Press.  In this lecture, he integrated criticism from another professor whose research I admire, Dr. Suresh Ca...
Post a Comment
Read more