Skip to main content

My Reintroduction to TESOL Methodology

From 2003 to 2007, TESOL Methodology was my thing.  I taught it as a teacher trainer at Sookmyung Women's University in Seoul, Korea and as a Senior English Language Fellow in Russia.  Before earning my PhD, those two jobs were the high points of my career.  Now I am in a position that combines those experiences with my newer (raw) skills as a researcher, coordinating curriculum for an intensive English program.  One thing I love about this job is that I get to revisit literature on TESOL methodology through the lens of a researcher.

Shocked Not Shocked


As I'm updating myself on the developments of content-based instruction (CBI), I was shocked how much of the literature is based more from the qualitative side of research than quantitative.  Then again, I had to remind myself about education research in general, that's it's quite difficult to conduct ethical and valid "experiments" in the classroom.  I remember that deflated feeling early in my coursework that many studies on teaching methods are not respected highly by many researchers.  I believe this is one reason for the divide between researchers and practitioners.  Many new teachers are told that a certain approach or methodology is the best way to teach their students, but most of that reasoning seems to be based on the institution's attachment or commitment to a philosophy rather than empirical evidence.

I feel like a bit of a hypocrite because my expertise is in TESOL methodology and qualitative research, however I am more convinced of results from quantitative research because I have a personal bias towards science and skepticism.  What I love about the advent of Web 2.0 is that we know can compile more and more narratives about what works and what doesn't work in the classroom from all over the world.  Some teachers are more connected than ever before because on social media and personal learning networks, but the problem still remains that these teachers are likely a certain type of teacher that does not represent all teachers.  So it is possible to compile more evidence that a certain teaching approach works better or worse than others.

Science of Learning


First of all, I'd like to promote a blogger, Russell Mayne, who writes on the science of learning in EFL, but I think many of his posts are relevant beyond the EFL contexts.  His blog is called Evidence Based EFL and can be found at http://malingual.blogspot.com/.  Please check it out!


Secondly, a great book for those with a preference for evidence-based pedagogy should check out the book Make It Stick: The Science of Successful Learning, which I blogged about last year at http://jesl1.blogspot.com/2014/09/make-english-language-learning-stick.html
Much of what I want to say about the science of learning is contained in that post.

What Am I Learning Now?

Through my reintroduction to TESOL methodology, I'm learning how more closely related TESOL is to fields outside of education and linguistics, such as philosophy and anthropology.  When I took courses in the departments of communications and sociocultural anthropology, one name came up in both that always sounded familiar but I couldn't exactly pin it down.  It was Dell Hymes, one of the "founders" of the communicative language teaching approach.  Through all of my graduate education, I learned much about him indirectly but I never had a course or the time to read through his work.  This shows that there is always much to learn in the little niche that is English language teaching even after you earn a PhD.  That being said, I'm not going to pursue another degree.


I am interested in learning more about making research more accessible to practitioners, and helping teachers develop critical thinking skills specifically on the latest research and trends to avoid getting snared by disciplinary buzzwords that are more sales pitches for publishers and technology peddlers than research-informed theories and practices.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Are you an Open Educator?

Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/gforsythe/18162314289 What is an Open Educator? According to a recently published article from the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL):

An Open Educator chooses to use open approaches, when possible and appropriate, with the aim to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning. He/she works through an open online identity and relies on online social networking to enrich and implement his/her work, understanding that collaboration bears a responsibility towards the work of others.

Does this sound attractive for English language teachers? It seems to some who offer courses through or with YouTube. But what does it mean "to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning?" Working for free? Not necessarily. If you read the article, it seems you'd be working on a sliding scale depending on the socioeconomic status of the learners, but this sliding scale is a sliding slope. How can poor le…

Engagement with Research as Professional Development

Last Thursday, I was reviewing literature for a research project that is just underway, and I came across a couple tables that resonated with me so much that I had to share it on Twitter. The tables come from Simon Borg's 2010 article "Language Teacher Research Engagement."


These tables would have come in handy if I had found them prior to my research project with teachers at an intensive English program (IEP) in the United States. They would have supported my professional learning and curriculum development philosophies as an administrator because I believe these two areas, professional learning and curriculum development, should have strongly overlapping goals as an English language teacher. Furthermore, I believe that it is in the best interest of an institution to support this in order to improve the curriculum. This belief is based on the assumption that curriculum is not static because is based on the needs of the learners, which are dynamic, as well as the resear…

Revisiting Multiliteracies & Moving On

I have been interested in a multiliteracies approach to English language learning and teaching for almost a decade now. I've been blogging about it since 2010 and I gave a presentation on this for two conferences in Iowa. I decided to put this interest aside so I could complete my dissertation on another topic and search for jobs. Now that a few years have passed, I'd like to share how my interest has changed.

The foundation of my interest is best represented by the Prezi I made (below) for my 2010 MIDTESOL Conference presentation:



My primary reference was Stuart Selber's 2004 book Multiliteracies for a Digital Age, published by Southern Illinois University Press. While working for the Kirkwood Center for Excellence in Learning and Teaching (KCELT), I found some similarities between my highlighted concepts from Selber's book and the Framework for 21st Century Learning, which you can view at http://www.p21.org/our-work/p21-framework. The third category (Information, Med…