Skip to main content

Models of Inquiry-Based Professional Development


This is my second blog post in response to my reading of Second Language Teacher Education: A Sociocultural Perspective by Karen E. Johnson, specifically to Chapter 7 on Inquiry-Based Approaches to Professional Development.  This chapter is really important to me because it combines my research interest on the professional development of English language teachers with my current position as curriculum coordinator at CESL, where one of my roles is to support and provide professional development for our faculty.

Chapter 7 describes five models of inquiry-based professional development, which I am reviewing as options to implement.  They are as follows:
  1. Critical Friends Groups
  2. Peer Coaching
  3. Lesson Study
  4. Cooperative Development
  5. Teacher Study Groups
Critical Friends Groups
This model focuses on "exploring and analyzing the dynamic nature of student learning" through the use of protocol-guided conversations, which provide the participants (teachers) with a lot of structure.  A great resource to learn more about this model is the National School Reform Faculty from the Harmony Education Center.  When you click on the link, you will understand how thorough this model is.  I'm not sure if CESL faculty needs something this structured to help meet our goals, so I will run it by them to see if there is any interest.

Peer Coaching
A great resource on peer coaching can be found through ASCD's website.  Don't confuse peer coaching with instructional coaching, which was a model being used in my previous institution.  Peer coaching differs from instructional coaching as it is less hierarchical.  For peer coaching, instructors observe each other and give feedback that is appropriate and acceptable to them.  Instructional coaching requires an instructional coach that may or may not be a peer and may or may not be a full-time faculty member.  Administrators may prefer the instructional coaching model more because the instructional coach is both administrator and teacher whereas the peer coaching model is more hands-off from the administration.  I'm a more trusting individual, so I would have no problems implementing peer coaching if CESL's faculty seem interested in this.  I believe elements of peer coaching already occur here.

Lesson Study
This model is more research-focused than the previous two models.  Teams of teachers work in depth to develop a lesson or a series of lessons that focuses on a particular topic or subject.  The team of teachers conduct research on both the content and student learning process prior, during, and after the implementation of the lesson or unit.  This seems like an appropriate professional development model for CESL's English for Academic Purposes courses, which use the sustained-content language teaching approach.  I'll soon learn how appropriate this model is when I start teaching an EAP course or two in the fall semester.

Cooperative Development
This model focuses a lot of the affective side of building a community of supportive colleagues.  From what I see at CESL, we already have a positive environment of trusting and helpful teachers.  Cooperative development offers a tight framework that allows programs to become more supportive and understanding.  More details on this can be found at http://cooperative-development.com/?page_id=439.  I think the success of this model depends on leadership that is open and trusting, otherwise it will not work and the discussions will be forced and insincere.

Teacher Study Groups
This model works when a program like CESL works in close collaboration with other university departments and professional associations like TESOL that are interested in researching the pedagogy, learning process, and language acquisition that takes place in the classroom and other learning spaces in and around CESL.  Of course, this is an ideal model but it takes a lot more effort to build a professional development model that includes all parties: faculty, administration, researchers, and the departments they represent.  I wonder if any IEP has implemented or attempted to implement this model.

Next Steps

I'm interested mostly in the first three models.  Peer coaching seems the easiest to establish here since elements of it are already in place at CESL.  Lesson study looks to be a great model to attempt with the EAP courses.  Before any of this happens, I would like to hold a meeting regarding professional development and perhaps organize a professional development committee if need be.

Are there any IEPs that have used these or other professional development models?  I'd like to learn more on how they have been successful or not.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What Is So Great About Extensive Reading?

I'm collaborating on a research and development project for integrating extensive reading into intensive English programs. After the initial review of the most recent literature, I was quite surprised at the overwhelming positive effects of extensive reading on reading proficiency, comprehension, and motivation. Although I'm still skeptical, I'd like to share the findings with you.

I looked at 17 articles published since 2012. Although this may not seem like much, 3 of these articles were meta-analyses, which investigated a much larger quantity of studies on extensive reading. Only one was not relevant to intensive English programs, bringing it down to 16 articles. Many of these articles came from the 2015 discussion forums in Reading in a Foreign Language. The majority of those discussion forum articles were not empirical studies, but they went in depth answering "What constitutes extensive reading?" After summarizing these answers, this blog post covers the res…

Are you an Open Educator?

Image from https://www.flickr.com/photos/gforsythe/18162314289 What is an Open Educator? According to a recently published article from the International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning (IRRODL):

An Open Educator chooses to use open approaches, when possible and appropriate, with the aim to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning. He/she works through an open online identity and relies on online social networking to enrich and implement his/her work, understanding that collaboration bears a responsibility towards the work of others.

Does this sound attractive for English language teachers? It seems to some who offer courses through or with YouTube. But what does it mean "to remove all unnecessary barriers to learning?" Working for free? Not necessarily. If you read the article, it seems you'd be working on a sliding scale depending on the socioeconomic status of the learners, but this sliding scale is a sliding slope. How can poor le…

The Tao of Praxis

Last week, I started reading The Tao of Pooh by Benjamin Hoff to my daughter as part of her bedtime regimen. I bought this book years ago after a colleague recommended it to me when he learned I was interested in Taoism. Since then I have embraced much of its philosophy, but I stop short of calling myself a Taoist. I didn't realize until now that Taoism has deeply affected my attitudes and beliefs towards English language teaching and scholarship, especially concerning the concept of praxis. Below are some examples.


The passage above comes from Chapter 3: Spelling Tuesday, page 26. It's not a subtle attack on academics, specifically those whose goals are to get published to be accepted among an elite circle of scholars. This is particularly striking to me because, at this point in my life, I would like to gain acceptance among this elite circle, which I perhaps naively equate to tenured professors. However, I strive to make my life's work beneficial to English language te…