What does this figure mean? This is one way the work of English language teaching can be framed, according to Pennington & Hoekje (2014). This appeals to me as both a practitioner and a researcher because attention to English language teaching is often simplified to only instruction. The other parts of the frame sometimes influence learning and pedagogy more than direct instruction. To learn how so, I will review the peripheral parts of the frame that support instruction. Disciplinary Field Pennington & Hoekje (2014) claim that the three disciplinary fields had the most affect on English language teaching curriculum: linguistics, psychology, and education. They also claim that the "home discipline of ELT" is applied linguistics, where studies on second language acquisition are in the heart of the profession. Coming from two graduate programs in education, I am much aware of the differences linguists, applied linguists, and educators br...
Attempting to bridge the research-practice gap in English language teaching with a focus on curriculum, instructional technology, and intercultural communication.